On June 1, 2015, the United States Supreme Court reversed a Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals decision and sided with the EEOC in a religious discrimination lawsuit against Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc.
The EEOC successfully argued that Abercrombie鈥檚 decision not to hire a Muslim applicant because her headscarf which conflicted with Abercrombie鈥檚 dress policy may have violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. The United States Supreme Court鈥檚 decision reverses a Tenth Circuit decision which held that the onus was on the job applicant to inform the employer that the headscarf was worn for religious observance and seek an accommodation. The United States Supreme Court held that a job applicant can prevail in a disparate treatment claim brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by showing that his or her potential need for an accommodation was at least a 鈥渕otivating factor鈥 in the employer鈥檚 decision not to hire the individual and that 鈥渁ctual knowledge鈥 based upon information provided by the applicant is not required. The case was remanded back to the Tenth Circuit for further consideration consistent with the Supreme Court鈥檚 opinion.